The Ghost of Melos
Reflections on the conflict with Iran
Monday March 2nd 2026
The Ghost of Melos
In 416 BCE, the Athenians stood on the shores of the neutral island of Melos and delivered the ultimate manifesto of raw power. They didn’t argue justice; they argued necessity. “The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must.” To the Athenians, their greatness was a law of nature, as immutable as gravity. They were certain that their superior tech, their “surgical” naval reach, and their inevitable expansion justified the erasure of anyone who stood in the way. They won the battle. They slaughtered the men and enslaved the women. But in doing so, they lost a part of themselves. The Greek world didn’t just fear Athens after Melos; they also grew tired of them. The “certainty” of their greatness became the very blind spot that led them to overreach in Sicily and eventually watch their empire crumble.
/////////
The Founders’ Warning: Patriotism vs Nationalism
The tragedy of late-stage Athens—and the jeopardy of our own moment—is the collapse of Patriotism into Nationalism. To the Founding Fathers, this distinction was the difference between a Republic and a Tyranny. Patriotism is what Madison envisioned: a quiet, steady affection for a constitutional order and the local soil. It is defensive, pluralistic, and rooted in the “ordered liberty” of a people who simply wish to be left alone to flourish. It is worth noting this is a frequent refrain from what used to be the conservative movement of the US
Nationalism, however, is the “monster” John Quincy Adams warned us about. It is the aggressive assertion of superiority that seeks to dictate the terms of the world. Adams knew that if America transitioned from a champion of her own liberty to a “dictatress of the world,” she might remain a powerhouse, but “the fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force.” When we trade the Patriotism of the home for naked Nationalism of the globe, we stop being the “well-wisher to the freedom of all” and start becoming the Athenian on that beach.
/////////
The actual nature of conflict
We see this play out today in the “chest-thumping” of decapitation strikes and high-tech interventions. To those in a temperature-controlled room, these actions look like “decisive” wins. They are clean, they are fast, and they make for great headlines. But as anyone who has lived through the protracted reality of military adventurism, I know that a “surgical strike” is rarely the end of the story; it’s usually just the opening scene and events have a funny way of going undesired directions.
We’ve fallen into the Athenian trap of believing that technology has exempted us from the laws of history and the immutable nature of conflict. We’ve forgotten what we should have never forgotten:
“You may fly over a land forever; you may bomb it, atomize it, pulverize it and wipe it clean of life—but if you desire to defend it, protect it and keep it for civilization, you must do this on the ground, the way the Roman legions did, by putting your young men (& women) in the mud.” (This Kind of War; modified)
Real strength comes from adherence to values and leading. It comes from having the patience to get Congressional approval for conflict. It comes from negotiating in good faith. It comes from treating your allies with respect, and standing up to your adversaries who are actually in the realm of those that can change the world in ways negative to our way of life. Too many have grabbed ahold of dimestore nationalism vice being thoughtful patriots. The responsibility of citizenship along with the rights it conveys. We are less for it. So is the world. The world isn’t going to forget either.